Accumulator systems and methods

ABSTRACT

Healthcare costs accumulated across a plurality of claims systems are managed using a centralized accumulator, which receives cost accumulator data for adjudicated claims from multiple sending claim systems. An accumulator record type is identified from the cost accumulator data and used to generate a cross-reference record. The record type includes an adjudicated claim. A routing message is generated for at least one receiving claim system according to the identified accumulator record type, the cost accumulator data received from the sending claim system, and an identity of the at least one receiving claim system. In response to sending the routing message to the receiving claim system, an acknowledgement is received, which is used to update the cross-reference record by the processor.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.16/055,937, filed Aug. 6, 2018, issued Feb. 18, 2020, as U.S. Pat. No.10,566,086, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.14/281,320, filed May 19, 2014, issued Aug. 7, 2018, as U.S. Pat. No.10,042,982, each of which is incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Implementations relate to computer systems, methods and computerreadable media for managing health care costs, and more particularly, tomanaging accumulator updates across a number of systems sharing membercost accumulators.

BACKGROUND

Many health insurance plans provide shared deductible and out-of-pocketlimits that cover different types of benefits. For instance, a medicalplan may share deductible and out-of-pocket expenses with the pharmacyand behavioral benefit plans. All of a member's medical, pharmacy andbehavioral claims would be applied against one deductible plan limit andone out-of-pocket limit, instead of three separate sets of accumulators(i.e. deductible and out-of-pocket limits) for each benefit type.

Often different benefit types are administered by different claimadjudication systems, e.g., three separate systems to handle medical,pharmacy and behavioral claims. In order for these systems to properlyapply a claim against a member's shared deductible and out-of-pocketlimits, they each must be aware of the claims the other systems may haveadjudicated for that member and the cost share amount applied to theshared accumulators. In a simple scenario, with three systemsadministering three different benefit types, medical, pharmacy andbehavioral, there are numerous interfaces and exchanges that are needed.For instance, the medical system sends accumulator updates to thepharmacy and behavioral systems for medical claims; and pharmacy andbehavioral systems need to send the medical system accumulator updatesfor a pharmacy claim or behavioral claim, respectively.

Further, for complex health care systems operating multiple medicalsystems, specialty benefit systems and external delegated entities, thenumber of interfaces needed to support the accumulator update processgrows dramatically. Moreover, these interfaces are typically developedas “one-offs” where each interface has its own requirements andspecifications. Consequently, there is a great deal of overlap and coststo maintaining and adding new interfaces. This problem is exacerbated bythe advent of health care reform, whereby commercial medical plans needto include pharmacy, behavioral, physical health, dental and visionbenefits as part of the core medical benefits with one set of sharedaccumulators.

Currently these interfaces are handled by each system receiving andsending file based updates to the other system. Typically these updatesare grouped together based on a specified time interval and submitted inbatches. This results in timing issues when a member submits multipleclaims for different benefit types within a short duration of time. Forinstance, a member submits a $200 medical claim and a $100 pharmacyclaim on the same day. Also assume the member's current out-of-pocketbalance is $1800 and the maximum is set at $2000. The medical systemprocesses the claim applying the $200 toward the out-of-pocket. Themember's out-of-pocket maximum has now been reached but the medicalsystem does not send the update to the pharmacy system until severaldays later as part of a batch process it runs. Meanwhile, the pharmacysystem receives the $100 claim and also applies it toward the member'sout-of-pocket since it is not aware of the $200 medical claim that wasalready processed. As a result the member has been charged an additional$100 when in fact the out-of-pocket maximum has already been reached.The member is dissatisfied and reports the issue, requiring theinsurance company to investigate the matter, reconcile claims andcorrect the problem. Consequently, there is a need to provide a way tomanage accumulator updates between multiple systems.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure provides a centralized accumulator for managingthe exchange and acknowledgement of accumulator updates between multiplesystems, such as claim adjudication engines, utilizing sharedaccumulators.

According to one implementation, a computer-implemented method manageshealthcare costs accumulated across a plurality of claims systems. Themethod involves using a computer processor that executes the steps tomanage such accumulated costs. The processor receives cost accumulatordata for a plurality of adjudicated claims from a plurality of sendingclaim systems. For instance, the cost accumulator data includes anaccumulated cost for healthcare services received by the member over aselected period of time. The processor identifies an accumulator recordtype from the cost accumulator data. These record types include anadjudicated claim, an initial accumulator record, an update accumulatorrecord and an acknowledgement accumulator record. A cross-referencerecord is generated by the processor for the cost accumulator dataaccording to the accumulator data type. A routing message is generatedby the processor for at least one receiving claim system different fromthe sending claim system, and in generating the message, the processoruses a) the identified accumulator record type, b) the cost accumulatordata received from the sending claim system, and c) an identity of theat least one receiving claim system. The routing message is routed tothe at least one receiving claim system by the processor, and at leastone of an initial, an update or an acknowledgement accumulator record isreceived by the processor from the at least one receiving claim system,which is used to update the cross-reference record by the processor.

According to another implementation, a computer system for managinghealthcare costs accumulated across a plurality of claims systems usesone or more computer processors to manage such costs. The processorsreceive adjudicated claim data for a plurality of adjudicated claimsfrom a plurality of sending claim systems. Cost accumulator records aregenerated by the processors using the adjudicated claim data for each ofthe plurality of members. These records may include, for instance, anaccumulation of healthcare costs incurred over a pre-defined timeperiod. For each of the plurality of cost accumulator records,accumulated costs are separated into deductible cost accumulator recordsand out-of-pocket cost accumulator records. In addition, for each of thedeductible cost accumulator records and the out-of-pocket costaccumulator records, the accumulated costs incurred within a network fora health plan of a member are separated from accumulated costs incurredoutside of the network. Consequently, four cost accumulator types aregenerated including a deductible in-network cost accumulator, adeductible out-of-network cost accumulator, an out-of-pocket in-networkcost accumulator, and an out-of-pocket out-of-network cost accumulator.A plurality of these cost accumulator types are routed to a plurality ofreceiving claim systems, which share cost accumulators at least one ofthe sending claim systems, and an acknowledgement from the receivingclaim systems is received by the processors. Such an acknowledgementincludes a record of the receiving claim system's cost accumulatorrecords for the plurality of the cost accumulator types routed.

In yet another implementation, a computer-implemented method formanaging healthcare costs accumulated across a plurality of claimssystems involves using a computer processor to manage these costs. Thecomputer processor receives claim data for at least one claim for amember of a health plan. The claim data is received from one of a firstmedical or non-medical claim system and includes accumulated cost ofservices received by the member under the health plan over a pre-definedperiod of time. An accumulator record is generated by the processorusing the accumulated cost of services received, and the processorroutes the accumulator record to another of the medical or non-medicalclaim system having an accumulator shared with the first medical ornon-medical claim system. An acknowledgement accumulator record isreceived by the processor from the another claim system, and theacknowledgement accumulator record includes the another claim system'saccumulated cost of services for the member under the health plan.

It will be understood the operations may be performed by one processoror multiple processors operating in concert, and the one or moreprocessors may be implemented using one or more servers.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is high-level block diagram of an example system architecture inaccordance with the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an example data processingapplication in accordance with the present disclosure.

FIG. 3A is a flow diagram of a method of updating accumulators accordingto the present disclosure.

FIG. 3B is a flow diagram of a sub-routine for the method of updatingaccumulators according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 3C illustrates a routing area table that may be used in connectionwith updating cost accumulators according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 3D illustrates a segment of an accumulator values area for anaccumulator record that may be used in connection with updating costaccumulators according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 4A is a process flow for updating accumulators using medical claimdata according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 4B is a process flow for updating accumulators using vision claimdata according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 4C is a process flow for updating accumulators using pharmacy claimdata according to the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION Overview

A centralized accumulator system manages cost accumulator updatesexchanged among multiple claim adjudication engines that share costaccumulators. Claim adjudication engines may communicate directly withthe centralized accumulator instead of with each other. The centralizedaccumulator system may serve as a hub for shared accumulators thatrequire updating across multiple claim adjudication engines, may managethe inter-system exchange of records, and may manage the local storageof such records.

Generally, cost accumulators applied to a member's health plan includefour different types based on the combination of one cost accumulatorand one benefit type. These include: 1) a deductible in-networkaccumulator, 2) a deductible out-of-network accumulator, 3) anout-of-pocket in-network deductible, and/or 4) an out-of-pocketout-of-network accumulator. Values associated with these accumulatorsmay include amounts applied, the current balances and annual maximums.Such accumulator values may be present for a member includingindividuals and a family under the member's plan. Accumulator values maybe calculated by a medical claim adjudication engine. That is, where aclaim is derived from a non-medical claim adjudication engine (e.g., adental, vision, behavioral, physical health or pharmacy claimadjudication engine), the claim may be routed to a medical claimadjudication engine for calculating benefits and accumulator values formembers, and the accumulator record may be provided to the centralizedaccumulator for management of the accumulator updates across multipleclaim adjudication engines.

Management of accumulators by the centralized accumulator systeminvolves identifying various types of accumulator records, validationand routing the records to those claim adjudication engines sharing costaccumulators for a member. Records supplied by source claim adjudicationengines may be stored by the centralized accumulator and may be used togenerate routing records that are transmitted to partnering claimadjudication engines based on cross-reference tables (e.g., routingtables) maintained by the centralized accumulator.

To support the processes of the centralized accumulator, four types ofaccumulator records may be sent to and/or generated by the centralizedaccumulator depending on the phase of flow the claim is in and thecontent. The four accumulator record types managed by the centralizedaccumulator include adjudicated claims (ADJCLM), initial accumulatorrecords (ACCINT), update accumulator records (ACCUPD) andacknowledgement accumulator records (ACCACK). Each of the participatingclaim adjudication engines may tag the records when it sends a record tothe centralized accumulator. As described, the centralized accumulatormay modify the tag when routing the record to partnering claimadjudication engines.

The ADJCLM accumulator record type represents a post-adjudicated claimrecord, which includes the amounts applied to each accumulator, thecurrent balances of each accumulator and annual maximums for eachaccumulator at the time it was adjudicated. If any of the accumulatorsare shared, the record identifies the claim adjudication engines wherethe accumulator information needs to be routed. Before the centralizedaccumulator routes the adjudicated claim record, it creates a subset ofthe record in the form of an accumulator record. For instance, thecentralized accumulator may tag the subset record as ACCINT if therecord is to be sent to a medical claim adjudication engine (since itrepresents an initial accumulator record for a medical system) or thesubset record may be tagged as ACCUPD if the record is to be sent tospecialty benefit claim adjudication engines (e.g. vision or dental).

As mentioned, the ACCINT accumulator record type represents a subset ofa post-adjudicated claim record, but contains the same accumulatorcontent as an ADJCLM record. Medical claim adjudication engines useACCINT records when a pharmacy or behavioral claim is sent to thecentralized accumulator. Additionally, some medical claim adjudicationengines may use this record type for a medical claim instead of sendinga full post-adjudicated claim record (ADJCLM). The centralizedaccumulator may route the entire content of the record, for instance,due to this record being formatted as an accumulator record. In someimplementations, before routing, the record's tag may be changed toACCUPD when the record for a recipient represents an accumulator update.

The ACCUPD accumulator record type may be sent by a medical claimadjudication engine to the centralized accumulator after processing anaccumulator record received from the centralized accumulator for aspecialty benefit claim. In addition or alternatively, the ACCUPD recordmay be sent by a centralized accumulator to non-medical claimadjudication engines. The ACCUPD record may contain the amounts appliedto each accumulator, the current balances of each accumulator and annualmaximums for each accumulator as it is currently reflected in themedical claim adjudication engine. If any of the accumulators areshared, the record identifies the claim adjudication engines where theaccumulator amounts need to be routed. The centralized accumulatorroutes the content of the ACCUPD record as well as additional data fromthe original ADJCLM or ACCINT record. If the centralized accumulatorsends the record back to the source of the claim, the record's tag ischanged to ACCACK, or alternatively, the same ACCUPD tag is used.

The ACCACK accumulator record type is sent by a specialty benefit systemafter receiving an ACCUPD or ACCINT record from the medical system viathe centralized accumulator. The ACCACK record may contain the amountsapplied to each accumulator, the current balances of each accumulatorand annual maximums for each accumulator as it is currently reflected inthe medical system. If the medical system requires acknowledgements, thecentralized accumulator routes the content of the record as well asadditional data from the original ADJCLM or ACCINT record. The sameACCACK tag may be kept. In some cases, specialty benefit systems such asdental and vision claim adjudication engines may require the ACCACKrecord where these systems initiated the transaction, or where all claimadjudication engines initiating the transaction are to receive an ACCACKrecord. Additionally, an ACCACK record can also be used by the medicalclaim adjudication engine to indicate that an overage situation or othertype of problem exists with the record received. In this case, an errorcode is sent by the medical claim adjudication engine to the centralizedaccumulator where the record is routed back to the original claimadjudication engine.

By tracking cost accumulators derived from post-adjudicated claim databased, in part, on accumulator record type, the shared accumulatorsystem is able to track the flow of accumulator data within the costaccumulator system and across multiple claim adjudication engines. Thecost accumulator system additionally tracks cost accumulator data based,in part, on accumulator record sub-type, which enables the systemidentify new accumulator records, replacements, deletions and so on.This enables the centralized accumulator system to generate detailedreports, track discrepancies across systems, and make corrections orreplacements to accumulator records, which may be transmitted topartnering systems, when applicable.

System Architecture

FIG. 1 is high-level block diagram of an example system architecture inaccordance with embodiments discussed herein. The example system isgenerally identified with reference numeral 100. The system 100 providesa centralized source for managing the exchange accumulator data amongmultiple claim adjudication engines utilizing shared accumulators andhas particular, but not exclusive application to payers administeringinsurance e.g., medical, dental, vision, behavioral, physical health andpharmacy insurance. The payer environment or other environment in whichthe system 100 operates typically contains one or more stations that arestaffed with personnel who are provided with one or more stationcomputing devices 104. For instance, payers operating claim adjudicationengines may house computing devices 104 for operation by specialiststrained to receive and adjudicate claims and to transmit accumulatorrecords to the centralized accumulator 112.

The computing device 104 may include memory and one or more processors108 that support the accumulator update functions of the system 100 aswell as the claim adjudication engine functionalities managed by themedical, dental, vision, pharmacy, behavioral or physical health claimadjudication systems. In one respect, the processor 108 may beconfigured to run computer executable code that manages the flow of datato and from other system components 100. The processor 108 mayadditionally be configured to run applications that execute higher leveldata processing functions. Thus, the processor 108 may be provided inassociation with a computer readable storage medium that storesprocessor executable code. The processor executable code may be storedon a long-term basis in a non-volatile memory portion of the computerreadable storage medium. The processor executable code may also beloaded into a volatile memory portion of the computer readable storagemedium from another location such as from across a network 124. Inaddition or alternatively, the one or more processors 108 may beconfigured as a server or a collection of servers. Further, the memoryof the computing devices 104 may include one or more databases.

The system 100 generally includes a centralized accumulator 112 thatcauses accumulators to be updated across the system using capabilitiesof one or more data processing applications. Such capabilities mayinclude logging, validation and storing accumulator records; partnersystem routing; logging transmission of accumulator events and reportgeneration. Data processing applications, or portions thereof, mayexecute on one or more severs 120 of the centralized accumulator 112,and in some instances, may execute on the processor 108 associated withthe computing device 104. The centralized accumulator 112 mayadditionally include one or more databases 116 that stores accumulatordata. By way of example, accumulator data may include electronicaccumulator records such as full claim records or partial claim recordswith data elements needed to support the accumulator exchange process,cross-reference tables (e.g., routing and reference tables), routingrecords, copies thereof, and so on.

FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an example data processingapplication 202 in accordance with embodiments discussed herein. Thedata processing application 202 includes or is in communication with thecentralized accumulator 112, which is communicatively coupled to thecomputing devices 104 associated with the claim adjudication engines. InFIG. 2, the data processing application 202 includes various dataprocessing capabilities 208 that facilitate the centralized accumulator112 in updating accumulator records across partnering claim adjudicationengines. In this regard, the data processing application 202 may becommunicatively coupled to, or portions may be integrally operable with,partnering claim adjudication engines such as medical systems 232,dental systems 236, vision systems 238, pharmacy systems 240, behavioralsystems 244 and physical health systems 248. For instance, the dataprocessing application 202 may be configured to deploy a commoninterface to each of the partnering claim adjudication engines tofacilitate communications with the centralized accumulator 112. Thecommon interface may require that accumulator record data needed tosupport the accumulator exchange process be submitted in a pre-definedformat. This common interface may replace individual interfaces eachclaim adjudication engine would otherwise need to develop and maintain.

Turning now to the various capabilities 208 of the data processingapplication 202, as can be seen in FIG. 2, the data processingapplication 202 may utilize a log receive event module 212, which may bein communication with the various application services and thecentralized accumulator 112. The log receive event module 212 may logkey information about post-adjudicated claims or accumulator recordswhen received into the system 100. The records generated by may includean inventory control number assigned by the centralized accumulator 112,a date and time the claim or accumulator record was generated, and anevent identification code corresponding to whether the claim oraccumulator record received is a received record, a routed record or acompleted record. Types of received records may include ADJCLM, ACCINT,ACCUPD or ACCACK and types of routed records may include ACCINT, ACCUPDor ACCACK. Accordingly, the log receive event module 212 causes an eventto be logged upon receipt by the system 100, and claim adjudicationengines sending such records also logs their own sending events.Consequently, the log receive event module 212 reconciles sending andreceiving of accumulator records with partnering claim adjudicationengines to ensure no transactions are lost between systems.

The accumulator record validation module 216 may cause records receivedand logged by the system 100 to be validated. Validation may involvechecking for duplicate records; confirming a start date is less than anend date; confirming required fields in the records are complete; and/orconfirming the records received are derived from post-adjudicatedclaims. For post-adjudicated claims (ADJCLM), validation may involveconfirming information from the claim is to be routed by confirmingrouting information complete, and if so, validating the requiredaccumulator fields in the claim. For initial accumulator records(ACCINT), update accumulator records (ACCUPD) or acknowledgementaccumulator records (ACCACK), validation may involve confirmingaccumulator values are present. For update or acknowledgement records,validation may involve confirming a record is present in across-reference table (e.g., claim information table) that relates tothe claim or accumulator record. Other fields in a record that may bevalidated include claim record type (e.g., claim or accumulator record),claim system identification (e.g., originating claim systemidentification), process flow key (e.g., ADJCLM, ACCINT, ACCACK,ACCUPD), responding/sending system identification, medical claimidentification number, accumulator record identification number,accumulator record sub-type, (e.g., update such as original,underpayment, overpayment, void, reissue (001); delete/replace such as arecord reprocessed prior to payment (002); or special replacement suchas a record resent replacement without negate applied (003)), coveragetype code (e.g., pharmacy, medical, behavioral health, vision, dental,or physical health), accumulator start date, accumulator end date,accumulator network type (e.g., in-network provider, out-of-networkprovider or out-of-network provider adjudicated as in-network provider),accumulator type (e.g., deductible or out-of-pocket), accumulatorbenefit type (e.g., in-network or out-of-network), accumulator appliedamount (individual and family) accumulator plan amount (individual andfamily), accumulator year-to-date amount (individual and family), and/orwhether an accumulator amount applies across accumulators.

The accumulator record storage module 220 may cause the record, orportions thereof, to be stored in one or more cross-reference tablesmanaged by the one or more databases 116. For instance, a claiminformation table may store records for each claim and initialaccumulator record. A names and addresses table may store, for eachclaim information record in the claim information table, one record fora subscriber and one record for a patient. A claim lines table may storeclaim lines-related data for each claim information record in the claiminformation table. A line accumulator values table, when applicable, maystore accumulator values for each claim lines record in the claim linestable. An accumulator header table may store one record for each claim,initial accumulator record, accumulator update record, and accumulatoracknowledgement record received. An accumulator values table may storeaccumulator values for each record (e.g., claim, initial accumulatorrecord, accumulator update record, and accumulator acknowledgementrecord) in the accumulator header table, including one record for eachcombination of accumulator type (deductible or out-of-pocket) andbenefit type (in-network or out-of-network) within a given accumulatorperiod. An accumulator routing table, when applicable, may store routinginformation for each accumulator header record in the accumulator headertable, one record for each combination of system where routing is tooccur, accumulator type (deductible or out-of-pocket) and benefit type(in-network or out-of-network). Further, reference tables may be used toconvert accumulator record information into a routable format.

The partnering system routing module 224 may cause shared accumulatorrecords to be routed to partnering systems for updating accumulatorrecords of the partnering systems. This enables the centralizedaccumulator 112 to serve as a central hub for the exchange of recordsfor all partnering systems. Using the partnering system module 224, thepartnering systems are identified, for instance, using information fromthe accumulator routing table, and routing records are generated androuted to the systems sharing a cost accumulator for a member. Routingmay be based on instructions provided by the sending system from whichthe claim or accumulator record is derived. In addition oralternatively, routing may be based on instructions provided by amedical claims system. In particular, such instructions may identifypartnering systems sharing a member's cost accumulator.

The log send event module 228 may log accumulator and/or routing recordsgenerated, log those that have errors, and log those that weresuccessfully sent to destination claim adjudication engines, e.g.,medical systems 232, dental systems 236, vision systems 238, pharmacysystems 240, behavioral systems 244 and physical health systems 248.

The retrieve accumulator records module 252, with the reports module256, may cause member accumulator records to be retrieved and reportsbased on the retrieved information to be generated. In addition, theretrieve accumulator member balance module 260 and the reports module264 may cause member accumulator balances to be retrieved and reportsgenerated based thereon. Such reports may be generated in response to aninquiry by a user 268. For instance, the modules 256, 264 may generatereports for use in reconciling out of balance situations that may occurbetween partnering systems.

Methods of Updating Accumulators

Turning to FIG. 3A, this figure is a flow diagram of a method 300 ofupdating accumulators according to the present disclosure. The steps ofFIG. 3A may be executed using the system of FIG. 1, and may additionallyor alternatively be implemented using the data processing application202 of FIG. 2. Method 300 begins by claim 304, accumulator records 308,or both, being received from a claims adjudication engine, anddetermining the record type at decision box 312. The record may be aclaim (ADJCLM) or an accumulator record, and the accumulator record maybe one of three types: an initial accumulator record (ACCINT), an updateaccumulator record (ACCUPD) or an acknowledgement accumulator record(ACCACK). For an adjudicated claim, the flow proceeds to operation 316and a claim received event is logged into tables used in connection withupdating accumulators. For an accumulator record, the flow proceeds tooperation 320 and an accumulator record received event is logged intotables used in connection with updating accumulators. For instance,logged within a claim information table are records of the receivedclaims and initial accumulator records. Each record in the claiminformation table may additionally be used to generate a correspondingrecord in a names and addresses table, and this table may include arecord for a subscriber and a record for a patient. Claims with recordsstored in the claim information table may additionally have claim linesstored in a claim lines table; and where applicable, accumulator valuesfrom the stored claim lines may be stored in a line accumulator valuestable. Claims records and initial accumulator records from the claiminformation table, as well as update accumulator records andacknowledgement accumulator records may additionally be used to generaterecords in an accumulator header table. For records stored in theaccumulator header table, corresponding accumulator values for theserecords may be stored in an accumulator values table for eachcombination of accumulator type (deductible or out-of-pocket) andbenefit type (in-network or out-of-network) for a pre-definedaccumulator period. In addition, where applicable, for records stored inthe accumulator header table, routing information for thesecorresponding records may be stored in an accumulator routing table. Therouting information may be stored as one record for each combination ofclaim adjudication engine to route to, accumulator type and benefittype, described below.

The logged records are validated in operation 324. Validations maydiffer based on the type of record received as described herein.According to certain implementations, validation may involve the ADJCLMor ACCINT accumulator records received from claim adjudication enginesbeing validated, in part, based on the accumulator record sub-type,e.g., 001, 002 or 003. Although the accumulator record sub-type isnumerically identified, the accumulator record sub-type identificationmay take any form, e.g., alphabetic (including symbols, punctuation andmathematical symbols), numeric, or alphanumeric. For an ACCUPD or ACCACKrecord, the following validation steps are not required as those recordsare inserted into the cross-reference tables upon other validationprocesses, such as those described in connection with FIG. 2 and due tothe records being derived from ADJCLM or ACCINT records. Eachaccumulator record sub-type may represent different types ofvalidations. This is summarized in Table 1:

TABLE 1 Accumulator Transac- record tion Event Type Description sub-typeCode Code Original Original Version of 001 00 00 the entire ClaimUnderpayment: Negate original claim 001 74 11 2 step Add new claim 00100 10 Underpayment: Up-adjust original 001 00 10 Differential line(s)Overpayment: Negate original claim 001 74 11 2 step Add new claim 001 0010 Overpayment: Down-adjust original 001 77 10 Differential line(s) VoidNegate original claim 001 74 11 Reissue Add new claim 001 87 00/10Delete Logical Delete 002 98 00/10 Replace of Replace of Previously 00200 00/10 Previously sent sent claim Claim that has not yet been sent toCheck Write 002 74 11 002 77 10 002 87 00/10 Special Resend ACCUMS, do003 00 00/10 Replacement: not negate 003 77 10 003 87 00/10

For instance, when processing an inbound record (ADJCLM or ACCINT) thathas an accumulator record sub-type of 001 and is an original following apreviously sent 1 or 002 replacement of a previously sent claim, theclaim ID for the inbound transaction (accumulator record sub-type of001) must be different from the previously sent accumulator recordsub-type 001 or 002 transaction. When processing an inbound record thathas an accumulator record sub-type of 002 and is a replacement followinga previously sent accumulator record sub-type of 001, the claim ID forthe inbound transaction must match the accumulator record sub-type 001transaction previously sent. When processing an accumulator recordsub-type of 002 that is a replacement following a previously sentreplacement (an accumulator record sub-type of 002), the claim ID on theinbound transaction must match the transaction that was previously sent.

Generally, validation of ADJCLM and ACCINT inbound records may includevalidating records by:

-   -   a. identifying and rejecting duplicates,    -   b. rejecting records having an illogical processing date and        time (e.g., where the date and time of an inbound record        precedes the date and time of a previously received record),    -   c. identifying a most recent record from a sequence of new        records and processing only the most recent record,    -   d. identifying situations where a negative record is needed for        an inbound 002 replacement and notifying the system and/or claim        adjudication engines of the deletion for the record being        replaced, and/or    -   e. identifying situations where a record needs to be deleted in        the system and/or in the claim adjudication engines.

More particularly, validation of inbound ADJCLM and ACCINT records mayinvolve querying the accumulator header table for the record with thehighest processing date and time having a matching claim adjudicationsystem ID and claim ID with the claim adjudication type of ADJCLM orACCINT. If the inbound record has an accumulator record sub-type of 001,and if no records were retrieved from the query, then the inboundtransaction is inserted into the database (e.g., in cross-referencetables) and routing is initiated as appropriate. If the query results inrecord retrieval of an accumulator record sub-type of 001, then theinbound transaction is rejected as a duplicate. Where the query resultsin record retrieval of an accumulator record sub-type of 002, and theinbound record has an illogical processing date and time compared to theretrieved record, then the inbound record is rejected or bypassed.Rejected records may appear on error report for claim adjudicationengine to address, while for skipped records, no additional action maybe needed on the claim adjudication engine's part and the record willnot appear on the error report.

For an inbound record having an accumulator record sub-type of 002 thatis a logical delete (e.g., the transaction code is 99), similar toabove, the accumulator header table may be queried for the record withthe highest processing date and time having a matching claimadjudication system ID and claim ID with the claim adjudication type ofADJCLM or ACCINT. If no record is retrieved, then the inboundtransaction may be rejected because there is no matching record tologically delete. If the record retrieved from the query has a finalizedstatus, then the inbound transaction may be rejected (e.g., because afinalized claim record cannot be logically deleted). If a record isretrieved that does not have a finalized status, a new record isinserted into the database that is a copy of the record retrieved fromthe query, fields that are required for negation are negated and theexisting record and the new record are deleted. Where applicable,accumulator routing may be performed on the negated record. See listbelow for fields that need to be negated.

For an inbound record having an accumulator record sub-type of 002 thatis a replacement of a previously sent claim (e.g., where the transactioncode is 00, 74, 77 or 87), then, similar to above, the accumulatorheader table may be queried for the record with the highest processingdate and time having a matching claim adjudication system ID and claimID with the claim adjudication type of ADJCLM or ACCINT. If no record isretrieved, then the inbound record is inserted into the database (out ofsequence, replacement is being processed before original) and performrouting as applicable. If the record retrieved has a finalized status,then the inbound record may be rejected because, as mentioned, afinalized claim record cannot be replaced. If the record retrieved fromthe query has an accumulator record sub-type of 001 and the claimprocessing date and time is greater than the inbound record, then rejectthe inbound record (the replacement needs to have a processing date andtime of greater than the original record).

If the record retrieved from the query has an accumulator recordsub-type of 001 and the processing date and time of the original is lessthan the inbound transaction, then the inbound transaction is insertedinto the database, a new record is inserted into the database that is acopy of the record retrieved from the query, fields that are requiredfor negation are negated and set for deletion. Additionally, ifapplicable, accumulator routing is performed on the negated record.

If the record retrieved from the query has an accumulator recordsub-type of 002 and the record has a processing date and time that isequal to the inbound transaction, then the record is rejected (illogicalsituation). If the record retrieved from the query has an accumulatorrecord sub-type of 002 and the processing date and time is greater thanthe inbound transaction, then the record is skipped (out of sequencesituation). If the record retrieved from the query has an accumulatorrecord sub-type of 002 and the processing date and time is less than theinbound transaction, then the inbound transaction is inserted into thedatabase, a new record is inserted into the database that is a copy ofthe record retrieved from the query, fields that are required fornegation are negated and the record is set for deletion. The originalrecord retrieved is also set for deletion. Additionally, if applicable,accumulator routing is performed on the negated record.

If the inbound record has an accumulator record sub-type of 003 (e.g.,where the transaction code is 00, 77 or 87), the accumulator record is areplacement for situations where a claim adjudication engine downstreamfrom the shared accumulator previously rejected a related accumulatorrecord. Because the record sub-type 003 is a replacement for recordspreviously rejected by downstream claim adjudication engines, theseengines will not have added the defective record, and as such, anegation of the original record is not performed like in situationswhere accumulator records having the sub-type of 002 are received forreplacement. Specifically, negation is unnecessary since the downstreamsystem rejected the original record. Accordingly, upon receipt of theaccumulator record sub-type of 003, similar to above, the accumulatorheader table may be queried for the record with the highest processingdate and time having a matching claim adjudication system ID and claimID with the claim adjudication type of ADJCLM or ACCINT. If no record isretrieved, the inbound transaction is rejected. For retrieved records,the inbound transaction is inserted into the database and routed to themedical system, and a new record is inserted into the database that is acopy of the record retrieved from the query, except that certain fieldsmay be negated. Unlike the other negate situations, accumulator routingis not performed on the negated record. The retrieved records are setfor deletion. In order to adjust year-to-date accumulators, the originalindividual accumulator amount applied is subtracted from the originalindividual accumulator year-to-date amount, and the original familyaccumulator amount applied is subtracted from the original familyaccumulator year-to-date amount.

Continuing with FIG. 3, the flow proceeds and a determination is made asto whether the validated records are valid in operation 328. Invalidrecords may be reprocessed in operation 332 and validations performed inoperation 324. Otherwise, where a determination is made that the recordsare valid, the flow proceeds to operation 334 where a process flow keyfor the record is determined. The process flow key may be one of ADJCLM(post-adjudicated claim), ACCINT (initial accumulator record), ACCUPD(update accumulator record) or ACCACK (acknowledgement accumulatorrecord). For ACCUPD and ACCACK, the flow proceeds to operation 338 wherea cross-reference for an original accumulator header record is retrievedfrom the accumulator header table, which links the update oracknowledgement record to the original claim or initial accumulatorrecord. The flow proceeds to operation 342 where a determination is madeon whether the record contains a shared accumulator value of greaterthan zero. If not, this means the accumulator record is not sharedacross multiple claim adjudication engines and the flow proceeds tooperation 346, where the input type is determined to be claim oraccumulator, and accumulator records are logged as a loaded accumulatorevent record in operation 350, while claims are logged as a loadedclaims event record in operation 354. When the shared accumulator valueis greater than zero, this means the record is shared across multipleclaim adjudication engines, and the flow proceeds to operation 358 wherea routing message for the record is written. The routing messageincludes key data elements that identify the record to another claimadjudication engine. For instance, the routing message may include anoriginating claim adjudication engine identification such as an initialvendor control number, claim identification information, date and timethe claim was processed, claim version number, record type (e.g.,ADJCLM, ACCINT, ACCUPD or ACCACK), accumulator record sub-type (e.g.,original, replacement, void, reissue or adjustment), asending/responding system identification, and the date and time therouting message is stored locally, e.g., in the database 116. The typeof record for the routing message may be determined at operation 346,and accumulator records for routing are logged as a loaded accumulatorevent record in operation 350, while claim records for routing arelogged as a loaded claims event record in operation 354. Where a routingmessage for the record is generated, at R, the method continues to theflow diagram of FIG. 3B.

FIG. 3B shows a flow diagram of a method 360 of updating accumulatorsaccording to the present disclosure. The steps of FIG. 3B may beexecuted using the system of FIG. 1, and may additionally oralternatively be implemented using the data processing application 202of FIG. 2. The method starts at R, and the flow proceeds to operation364 where the routing message generated in operation 358 is read. Usingthe key data elements from the routing message, the flow proceeds tooperation 368 where accumulator records are retrieved from tables. Forinstance, records may be retrieved from the accumulator header table,accumulator values table, accumulator routing table, claim informationtable, claim lines table and/or line accumulator values tables. Based ondata retrieved from the accumulator routing table, each claimadjudication engine targeted to receive an updated accumulator recordhas routing records generated. For example, a routing record may begenerated for each applicable cost accumulator, accumulator value orboth. The routing records for an accumulator record may be written to arouting area such as the routing area table 372 illustrated in FIG. 3C.In this example, records for four different claim adjudication enginesare illustrated, dental (DN) 373, vision (VS) 374, prescription (RX)375, and behavioral health (BH) 376 and are to receive an accumulatorrecord derived from another claim adjudication engine, e.g., a medicalclaim (MD) adjudication engine. In other examples, one of the claimadjudication engines for routing accumulator records may be the same asthe claim adjudication engine from which the claim was derived, such aswhen an originating claim adjudication engine requires anacknowledgement of an update from a responding claim adjudicationengine. Each of the claim adjudication engines may receive up to fourdifferent accumulator updates (e.g., cost accumulator types): an updatefor a deductible amount in-network (DED, I) 377, an update for adeductible amount out-of-network (DED, O) 378, an update for anout-of-pocket in-network (OOP, I) 379, and/or an update for anout-of-pocket out-of-network (OOP, O) 380. For each of the targetedclaim adjudication engines, the following operations 372-398 may beexecuted.

Where multiple modes of communication (e.g., via web services,business-to-business operations, intranet and/or Internet) areresponsible for transmitting updates to the various claim adjudicationsystems, the targeted claim adjudication engine may be evaluated inoperation 382 to identify the designated mode of routing.

A working copy of the routing record may be written in operation 382.This operation may facilitate generation of records formatted for thetarget claim adjudication engine in instances where the content (e.g.,accumulator values, routing area, process flow key) of the accumulatorrecord information retrieved from the tables differs from theinformation that needs to be routed. In this way, the working copy maybe modified with information required for the receiving claimadjudication engine, while information required for the system 100and/or data processing application 202 may remain unchanged.

In operation 384, the working copy may be edited based on the receivingclaim adjudication engine. Edits to the working copy may involve, forinstance, the addition of accumulator values retrieved in operation 368that match the accumulator and benefit types (e.g., cost accumulators)identified in the routing area of the accumulator record. For instance,referring to FIG. 3C, the claim adjudication engines may receive betweentwo and four types of accumulator updates (e.g., 377-380), andaccumulator values may be written for each update. Where the processflow key equals ACCUPD and the targeted claim adjudication engine is thesame as the adjudicating system (e.g., based on the originating claimadjudication engine identification), the process flow key may be changedto ACCACK. This edit may be due to the receipt of an accumulator updaterecord that actually represents an acknowledgement for the originalsystem that submitted the accumulator record (ACCINT). Where the processflow key equals ACCINT, then the process flow key may be updated toACCUPD. Where the process flow key equals ADJCLM and it is being routedto a medical system, then the process flow key may be changed to ACCINT.For ACCACK records received that are to be routed to a medical system,the working copy may be updated to include a vendor code or othermapping data. The following example describes how the accumulator valuesand routing areas are edited. For example, shown in FIG. 3D is a samplesegment 386 of an accumulator values area for an accumulator record thatmay be used in connection with updating claim adjudication engines. InFIG. 3D, accumulator value updates 387-390 for a predefined accumulatorperiod are illustrated for the four different accumulator record types377-380, respectively. In the sample routing area table of FIG. 3C,there are four claim system ID records, and assume the first record 373for a dental claim adjudication engine is to be processed. In this caseall four cost accumulator record types 377-380 and correspondingaccumulator value updates 387-390 (e.g., individual amounts, individualplan limits, year-to-date amounts applied to the individual, familyamounts, family plan limits, year-to-date amounts applied to the family)would be added to the working copy since all of the benefit andaccumulator types match what was identified in the first record of theoriginal routing area. In the routing area of the working copy, only arecord corresponding to the dental claim adjudication engine record 373may be included. Next, assume the fourth record of the routing areatable of FIG. 3C, 376 for a behavioral health claim adjudication engineis to be processed. In this case, only two accumulator record types377-378 and corresponding accumulator value updates 387-388 would beadded to the working copy since only those records match the benefit andaccumulator types identified in the fourth record of the originalrouting area. In the routing area of the working copy, only a recordcorresponding to the behavioral health claim adjudication engine record376 may be included.

Continuing with FIG. 3B, the flow proceeds to operation 392 where theworking copy record is written to a message queue in the routing rulestable. The flow proceeds to decision box 394 where a determination ismade as to whether the write is successful. If not, a retry process isperformed until the write is successful in operation 396. If the writeis successful, then a successful route send event is logged at operation398, and the routing rules table is updated to include a systemidentification for the claim adjudication engine receiving theaccumulator update, and the flow ends.

In view of the foregoing, accumulator records may be received, storedand routed to various claim adjudication engines. FIGS. 4A-4C providethree basic process flows for the exchange of accumulator records,updates and acknowledgements across medical, specialty benefit claimadjudication systems (e.g., vision and dental) and pharmacy andbehavioral claim adjudication systems.

FIG. 4A illustrates a high level process flow 400 for the exchange ofclaim and accumulator records from a medical claim adjudication engine402. A medical claim 404 generated by the medical claim adjudicationengine 402 may be transmitted at step 406 as adjudicated claim data(AJDCLM) or as an in initial accumulator record (ACCINT) to the system100/data processing application 202. The system 100 and/or the dataprocessing application 202 may generate accumulator records, forexample, according to the methods described above in connection withFIGS. 3A-3B, and may transmit as update accumulator records (ACCUPD) topartnering claim adjudication engines that share accumulators. In FIG.4A, a dental claim adjudication engine 408 and a vision claimadjudication engine 410 may each receive update accumulator records(ACCUPD) 412, 414, respectively, and each may acknowledge receipt of theupdate by transmitting an acknowledgement accumulator record (ACCACK)416, 418, respectively. Optionally, the centralized accumulator 212/dataprocessing application 202 may be required to transmit acknowledgements420, 422 to the medical claim adjudication engine 402 upon thecentralized accumulator 212/data processing application 202 receivingacknowledgements 416, 418 of the updates from the respective dental andvision claim adjudication systems 408, 410. In addition, the medicalclaim 404 generated by the medical claim adjudication engine 402 mayoptionally be transmitted to 424 and acknowledged by 426 other specialtysystems 428 that share accumulators.

FIG. 4B illustrates another high level process flow 430 for the exchangeof claim and accumulator records from a specialty benefit claimsadjudication engine (e.g. vision and dental claim adjudication engines).In FIG. 4B, the process flow is for a vision claim 432 from the visionclaim adjudication engine 410. The vision claim 432 may be transmittedas a post-adjudicated claim (ADJCLM) 434 to the system 100/dataprocessing application 202, where the received claim data is processedinto an initial accumulator record (ACCINT) and transmitted 436 to themedical claim adjudication engine 402. The medical claim adjudicationengine 402 may generate an updated accumulator record (ACCUPD) afterprocessing the initial accumulator record received from the centralizedaccumulator for the specialty benefit claim. In some implementations,the medical claim adjudication engine 402 may optionally transmit 438 anaccumulator record and receive an acknowledgement 440 from otherspecialty claim adjudication engines 428. The medical claim adjudicationengine 402 sends 442 the system 100/data processing application 202 arecord containing the updated accumulator record (ACCUPD). The system100/data processing application 202 then routes the updated accumulatorrecord to the specialty benefit systems that share accumulators. For thedental system 408, the record is sent 444 as an update accumulatorrecord (ACCUPD), whereas, for the vision system 410, the record is sent446 as an acknowledgement record due to the vision system 410 generatingthe original vision claim 432 for the process flow 430. The vision anddental systems 410, 408, respectively, then send the system 100/dataprocessing application 202 acknowledgement records (ACCACK) 448, 450.When required, upon receipt of acknowledgement records (ACCACK) 448,450, the system 100/data processing application 202 sendsacknowledgement records (ACCACK) 452, 454 to the medical claimadjudication engine 402. The process flow 430 may additionally beapplicable to behavioral claims, according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 4C illustrates another high level process flow 460 for the exchangeof claim and accumulator records from a prescription claims adjudicationengine 462. In FIG. 4C, pharmacy claim 464 from the pharmacy claimadjudication engine 462 may be transmitted 466 first to the medicalclaim adjudication engine 402 where the received pharmacy claim data isprocessed into an initial accumulator record (ACCINT) and transmitted468 to the medical claim adjudication engine 402. At step 470 and 472,the system 100/data processing application 202 sends a record containingthe updated accumulator record (ACCUPD) to the dental claim adjudicationengine 408 and the vision claim adjudication engine 410, respectively.The vision and dental systems 410, 408, respectively, then send thesystem 100/data processing application 202 acknowledgement records(ACCACK) 474, 476. When required, upon receipt of acknowledgementrecords (ACCACK) 474, 476, the system 100/data processing application202 sends acknowledgement records (ACCACK) 478, 480 to the medical claimadjudication engine 402. In some implementations, the medical claimadjudication engine may optionally transmit 482 an accumulator recordand receive an acknowledgement 484 from other specialty claimadjudication engines 428.

The technology described herein may be implemented as logical operationsand/or modules in one or more systems. The logical operations may beimplemented as a sequence of processor-implemented steps executing inone or more computer systems and as interconnected machine or circuitmodules within one or more computer systems. Likewise, the descriptionsof various component modules may be provided in terms of operationsexecuted or effected by the modules. The resulting implementation is amatter of choice, dependent on the performance requirements of theunderlying system implementing the described technology. Accordingly,the logical operations making up the embodiments of the technologydescribed herein are referred to variously as operations, steps,objects, or modules. Furthermore, it should be understood that logicaloperations may be performed in any order, unless explicitly claimedotherwise or a specific order is inherently necessitated by the claimlanguage.

In some implementations, articles of manufacture are provided ascomputer program products that cause the instantiation of operations ona computer system to implement the invention. One implementation of acomputer program product provides a non-transitory computer programstorage medium readable by a computer system and encoding a computerprogram. It should further be understood that the described technologymay be employed in special purpose devices independent of a personalcomputer.

The above specification, examples and data provide a completedescription of the structure and use of exemplary embodiments of theinvention as defined in the claims. Although various embodiments of theclaimed invention have been described above with a certain degree ofparticularity, or with reference to one or more individual embodiments,those skilled in the art could make numerous alterations to thedisclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of theclaimed invention. Other embodiments are therefore contemplated. It isintended that all matter contained in the above description and shown inthe accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative only ofparticular embodiments and not limiting. Changes in detail or structuremay be made without departing from the basic elements of the inventionas defined in the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer system for managing healthcare costsaccumulated across a plurality of claims systems, the system comprisingone or more computer processors performing the steps of: receiving claimdata at an accumulator, the claim data for a plurality of members undera plurality of health plans; generating cost accumulator records usingthe claim data for each of the plurality of members, wherein the costaccumulator records comprise an accumulation of healthcare costsincurred; storing the cost accumulator records in an accumulator headertable, wherein for each of the plurality of cost accumulator recordsstored in the accumulator header table, the accumulated costs areseparated into cost accumulator records of a first type and costaccumulator records of a second type, wherein for each of the costaccumulator records of the first type and the second type, theaccumulated costs incurred within a network for a health plan of amember are separated from the accumulated costs incurred outside of thenetwork thereby generating four cost accumulator types including anin-network cost accumulator of the first type, an out-of-network costaccumulator of the first type, an in-network cost accumulator of thesecond type, and an out-of-network cost accumulator of the second type;validating the cost accumulator records by querying the accumulatorheader table based on a cost accumulator sub-type associated with eachcost accumulator record; and receiving an acknowledgement from aplurality of receiving claim systems at the accumulator, theacknowledgement comprising a record of the receiving claim system's costaccumulator records for the plurality of the cost accumulator typesrouted.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein validating further comprisesidentifying a most recent record from a sequence of new records forprocessing.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein for each cost accumulatorrecord, further comprising the step of retrieving a cross-reference foran original accumulator header record from the accumulator header table,the cross-reference linking the acknowledgement to the claim data. 4.The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more computer processors arefurther configured to determine whether each cost accumulator recordcontains a shared accumulator value of greater than zero.
 5. The systemof claim 4, wherein if the shared accumulator value is greater thanzero, a routing message for the cost accumulator record is written. 6.The system of claim 5, wherein the routing message includes anoriginating claim adjudication engine identification information.
 7. Thesystem of claim 4, wherein if the shared accumulator value is notgreater than zero, the one or more computer processors determines aninput type for the cost accumulator record, the input type including aclaim or an accumulator.
 8. The system of claim 5, wherein the one ormore computer processors are further configured to read the routingmessage and retrieve an accumulator record from the accumulator headertable.
 9. The system of claim 5, wherein the one or more computerprocessors are further configured to write and edit a working copy ofthe routing message.
 10. The system of claim 1, further comprisingreceiving, at the accumulator, an update accumulator record or anacknowledgement accumulator record.
 11. The system of claim 1, furthercomprising updating, via the accumulator, a plurality of accumulatorsacross the plurality of claims systems.
 12. The system of claim 1,wherein the plurality of claims systems comprise medical claims systems,dental claims systems, vision claims systems, pharmacy claims systems,behavioral claims systems, physical health claims systems, orcombinations thereof.
 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or morecomputer processors are further configured to deploy a common interfaceto each of the plurality of claims systems to facilitate communicationwith the accumulator.
 14. The system of claim 1, wherein after receivingthe claim data, the one or more computer processors are furtherconfigured to log key information embodied in the claim data.
 15. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the claim data comprises adjudicated claimdata or a received initial accumulator record for a plurality ofadjudicated claims.
 16. The system of claim 1, wherein the accumulatorrecords of the first type are deductible cost accumulator records. 17.The system of claim 1, wherein the accumulator records of the secondtype are out-of-pocket cost accumulator records.
 18. A computer systemfor managing healthcare costs accumulated across a plurality of claimssystems, the system comprising one or more computer processorsperforming the steps of: receiving claim data at an accumulator, theclaim data for a plurality of members under a plurality of health plans;generating cost accumulator records using the claim data for each of theplurality of members, wherein the cost accumulator records comprise anaccumulation of healthcare costs incurred; storing the cost accumulatorrecords in an accumulator header table, wherein for each of theplurality of cost accumulator records stored in the accumulator headertable, the accumulated costs are separated into a plurality of types ofcost accumulator records, wherein for each type of cost accumulatorrecord, the accumulated costs incurred within a network for a healthplan of a member are separated from the accumulated costs incurredoutside of the network thereby generating at least four cost accumulatortypes including an in-network cost accumulator of a first type, anout-of-network cost accumulator of the first type, an in-network costaccumulator of a second type, and an out-of-network cost accumulator ofthe second type; receiving an acknowledgement from a plurality ofreceiving claim systems at the accumulator, the acknowledgementcomprising a record of the receiving claim system's cost accumulatorrecords for the plurality of the cost accumulator types routed; andretrieving a cross-reference for an original accumulator header recordfrom the accumulator header table, the cross-reference linking theacknowledgement to the claim data.
 19. The system of claim 18, furthercomprising updating, via the accumulator, a plurality of accumulatorsacross the plurality of claims systems.
 20. The system of claim 18,wherein the claim data comprises adjudicated claim data or a receivedinitial accumulator record for a plurality of adjudicated claims.